http://acikerisim.ktu.edu.tr/jspui/handle/123456789/1222 2026-04-18T13:09:50Z 2026-04-18T13:09:50Z Türkmen, Emre http://acikerisim.ktu.edu.tr/jspui/handle/123456789/1994 2021-12-03T00:00:43Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Bir Varoluş Mücadelesi Olarak 'Ateşten Gömlek' Romanına Söylem Analizi ile Yaklaşım Authors: Türkmen, Emre Abstract: This study examines the social-historical novel titled “The Shirt of Flame”, which allows the reader interpret history from an unorthodox source of history. The backstage of the novel is woven with history and ideology that can be inferred from the title of the novel, and the novel itself is loaded with metaphors and symbols. Therefore, this study follows the discursive analysis as its approach. The characters of the novel, and their stories and life struggles reflect the survival-existential struggle of the society. The discursive analysis reveals that the author, Halide Edib, intended to associate the prewar and post-war personal life stories of the characters with the transition from the Empire to the nation-state of Turkey. This association symbolizes the birth fangs of nation-building during which people sacrificed their lives for, thus, the metaphor revolves around “the new life” and “the old life”. With labeling the novel as “The Shirt of Flame”, Halide Edib idealized the characters who supported the national cause while marginalizing those against it. This study aims to demonstrate how the narrative of the novel embodied the contrast between the “new” and “old” life through the characters and their actions.

2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Türkmen, Emre http://acikerisim.ktu.edu.tr/jspui/handle/123456789/1957 2021-03-25T03:31:12Z 2020-09-09T00:00:00Z

Title: Türkmen Türkçesi ve Türkiye Türkçesinde Aktarma Cümlelerinin Karşılaştırılması Authors: Türkmen, Emre Abstract: Turkmenian language takes place in East section of Oghuz Group of Turkic languages. It is known that as an official language Turkmenian was created later period compared to Turkish language and Azerbaijan language. Turkish and Turkmenian which belong to Oghuz Group of Turkic languages follow same ways to construction of reporting clause. The examples of reporting clause which taken from both languages show similar construction in respect to their constituent parts, construction properties, adjunction to main sentence and the properties of the sentence. On the other hand, reporting clause in Turkmenian is different from reporting clause in Turkish in a few ways. There are morphological and orthographical differences regarding the construction ofthe reporting clause. The reporting clause is widely accepted as nested compound because of the classification of the sentences according to their structures in Turkish grammars. Unlike Turkish grammars, it is accepted as ‘başganıñ gepi’ due to the internal sentence of nested compound sentence in Turkmenian grammars. The term reporting clause will use as a label for these sentences in this study. The reporting clauses convey thoughts or statements in varied forms with quotations included. In reporting clause construction, the quotations and metaphrases correspond to the reported clause. This study compares reporting clauses in Turkmenian language to reporting clauses in Turkish language.

2020-09-09T00:00:00Z Türkmen, Emre http://acikerisim.ktu.edu.tr/jspui/handle/123456789/1234 2021-03-25T03:21:19Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Söylem Analizi Denemesi: 3 Numaralı Mühimme Defteri’nde Şehzade Bayezid’in Yakalanmasına İlişkin Yer Alan Hükümler Authors: Türkmen, Emre Abstract: The historical Mühimme defters (records) of the Ottoman Empire contain the copies of the Sultan- sanctioned edicts (fermans), which were the products of the decisions taken in the Supreme Council (Divan-ı Hümâyun). Because these records were kept in the Divan, which was the highest administrative and judicial organ of the Empire, they were regarded amongst the principal primary sources, especially for the 16th and 17th centuries. They were thoroughly analyzed by some historians (Kütükoğlu, 2006: 520, 523). This study examines an official source from the Kanuni era, “Mühimme Defter No. 3”, which includes the addresses to the governors (beylerbeyi) of Diyarbekir, Şam, Erzurum, Rum, Bağdad and Van, and the beys of Ardahan, Trabzon, Karahisar-ı Şarki and Kefe, Mehmed Paşa, Kubad Paşa and the Khan of Crimea on the subject of the capture of the heir apparent Bayezid with a discourse analysis approach. Conceptually, a “discourse” not only involves the content of the message but also the source (who gives the message?), the authority (what is the message based on?), the audience (to whom the message is given?) and the intention (what does the source want to achieve with the message?) of the message (Çelik ve Ekşi, 2008: 100). The discourse analysis, thus, examines the syntax and semantical structure of the texts or the language and deals both with the linguistic and socio-cultural dimensions of discourse (Çelik ve Ekşi, 2008: 107). In this context, with the help of the discursive strategies in the discourse-historical approach (Reisigl, 2018: 52), this study aims to determine how the information was produced about the heir apparent Bayezid, on what grounds he was considered a threat to the crown and how this conception was located. By doing this, we believe that the power relations of the period and its representation in the official statements can be uncovered in the fermans. The study begins with the demonstration of the antagonism between the rival heir apparents Bayezid and Selim and proceeds with the explanation of how the two young candidates were situated based on the statements in the fermans. Also, the latent power relations of the period will be demonstrated based on the causality relations and the choice of words in the statements. Twenty-seven statements were examined in this study. The analysis revealed that the heir apparent Bayezid was considered a threat and his image in his father’s mind was unfavorable. The statements concerning Bayezid included the phrases such as “gathering soldiers (asker toplamak)”, “causing malice (fesada sebep olmak)”, “being a deserter (firar etmek)”, “rebelling (isyan etmek)”, “fighting against the Believers (ehl-i İslâm ile cenk etmek)”, “marching against the heir apparent Selim (Şehzade Selim üzerine yürümek)”, and “being routed and defeated (mağlup ve münhezim olmak)” and he was accused of conspiring against the State and necessary measures were ordered by the Sultan to be taken to his officials.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Türkmen, Emre http://acikerisim.ktu.edu.tr/jspui/handle/123456789/1233 2021-03-25T03:21:48Z 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Cümlede Bir Öge Görevi Yapan Cümle Örnekleri Üzerine Authors: Türkmen, Emre Abstract: A sentence is defined on the basis of being a group of words with meaning that carry a judgment constituted around the terms of structure, form, unit, composition, series, statement, unity and wholeness. By the same token, the types of sentences are also determined according to their structure, meaning, type of predicates, junction and establishment. While mentioning the nested compound sentences, which are defined structurally “as being formed when a sentence is placed into another sentence”, we talk of a situation whereby a sentence becomes element of another sentence or becomes a noun in that respective sentence (Ergin, 2004: 406). At this point, there comes the question of whether the inserted sentence will become a noun phrase or not. Dizdaroğlu (1976: 89, 92, 114, 128, 138, 160) states that the finite verbs can take the form of noun phrases as adverbial clauses, direct or indirect objects and location impliers. On the other hand, Deny (2012: 684) stresses the fact that in the possessive constructions the genitive element can either be a sentence or a direct phrase, and since an indirect phrase can be defined as a word, it can take a possessive or case suffix. Moreover, besides the syntax structures, some argue that the exclamation phrases can be considered as sentences because they express emotion or excitement. Nonetheless, in some sources exclamation phrases are considered as sentences in terms of their meaning. Due to the limits of this study, on the basis of the problematic question of “Does a sentence’s character as an element of another sentences make it a nominalized sentence?” some examples are examined in possessive constructions and adjective clauses, adverbial clauses and some exclamation phrases such as “Allah korusun”, and some internal phrases such as “Eh, davul dengi denginedir hesabı kendi gibi yoksul bir kızla evlendirmişler”. These structures are discussed in the study on the question of whether they can be considered as nominalized sentences or not.

2019-03-01T00:00:00Z